Yay or Nay ?
Thoughts comments suggestions
and add more AA defensives
one AA gun per battleship bullshit!!!
correct me if im wrong but isnt the gun on the side of the aircraft carrier used to shoot incoming missles ? im 90 % sure
2011-12-14 11:50 , edited 2011-12-14 11:53 by EnlistedBunny
Why? What for? stick to the ground combat this is not naval warfare hence the name Battlefield and yes I realize 1942 allowed you to control ships but no need in modern times. capital ships and battleships are obsolete and carriers are just floating airfields no need for it to move it servers its purpose.
Nay and that would be a waste.
Not only did I purchase Premium service for $49.99 but I also got a FREE 5 oz bottle of lube.
remember 1942 with subs...
the game is called battlefield cough cough should be able to fight on all fronts !!!!
2011-12-14 11:54 , edited 2011-12-14 11:56 by EnlistedBunny
Bryan985 said:Battlefield 1942 had drivable aircraft carriers/battleships.
Why? What for? stick to the ground combat this is not naval warfare
Yeah like you said 1942 as in not modern times modern navies do not use ships for shore bombardment anymore and ship to ship combat is a thing of the past what with cruise missiles and such a battleship would be useless no room to move around and it would be just a floating gun battery and no real need for unbalanced 16inch shore bombardments and a ship thats just a easy target to blow up
Yeah like you said 1942 as in not modern times modern navies do not use ships for shore bombardment anymore and ship to ship combat is a thing of the past what with cruise missiles and such
fair enough but its a video game !!!!! it doesnt always have to be dead on
Perhaps include some patrol/torpedo boats for those who love sea combat?
A powerful sea to land based gun platform would shake things up.
As long as it doesnt break the games core mechanics and play im in.
yeah thats perfect. AA guns arent over powered enough already when a jet is near. So lets drive the Aircraft carrier into the island. and then we can have 100 AA guns shooting everything that moves. FUKING BRILLIANT
2011-12-14 12:01 , edited 2011-12-14 12:02 by MatthewHiyan
ok so beach the aircraft carrier and then the other team sinks it done deal
the AA guns on the battleship are SHIT
and btw there is only one AA gun and make it so it can be destroyed and repaired
carriers do not carry weapons for shore bombardment unless its missiles and we do not need a person sitting off shore shooting cruise missiles maybe a few more airplanes or helicopter but thats stretching it
People would start driving onto the shore and use the Centurion(R2D2 gun) on the back. lol
yea the maps are not set up for naval combat just stick to the ground stuff
Capt. J. Shields
Commanding Officer, Warlords
"Honor, Courage, Strength"
Sink able AIr Craft Carrier ..........Sunk and its gone
AA gun on ACC -- should be able to damage/ destroy , repair it
2011-12-14 12:04 , edited 2011-12-14 12:05 by DMC_au
beaching the carrier YAH.....lets not get to ahead of ourselves, first lets get rid of that fucking out of bounds on the carrier .... "assault conquest" my ass...
about this is not 1942 n stuff...
so modern warfare (not as in COD) is all about running around in 4 man squads just shooting stuff you want to shoot?
its a stupid idea. If you want that crap try get them to add it onto ARMA 3 and play that. Its BF3 and if you have a battleship that is drivable it will be kinda stupid. Maybe a new game mode for BF3 like Naval Battle. 2 Aircraft Carriers vs each other with 4-6 jets on each team. Both get 1-2 AA guns and you can raid the other ship and plant a bomb or blow up the other ship with the cannons which people can control. It would kinda work cuz the only people that would play that game mode is people who WANT too. I dont know something like that