XxSiL3nTwInDxX

Enlisted:
2011-11-06
2012-05-21 20:49
bf3 on console should have 32 man servers agreee or disagree??
Stacker44

Enlisted:
2011-10-26
2012-05-21 20:52
ok we all agree but its not possible. Its been said a million times. End of discussion.
COFFIN-FILLER187

Enlisted:
2011-10-25
2012-05-21 22:16
agree 1000%
IF YOU DONT LIKE IT CALL 1-888-382-5968 and tell them!!!!!!!!!!!!
KingdomSlayah

Enlisted:
2012-01-16
2012-05-22 00:49
Agree BUT CONSOLES CANT HANDLE IT FOR THE LAST TIME.... I swear the amount of idiots you see on the internet....
T-Rex shall rise from the ashes... AND BRING A NEW ERA OF GAMING!!
Chadley86

Enlisted:
2012-01-15
2012-05-22 00:49
KingdomSlayah said:
Agree BUT CONSOLES CANT HANDLE IT FOR THE LAST TIME.... I swear the amount of idiots you see on the internet....
Will be buying Battlefield premium and proud of it!
EU RUSH players add Chadley_86 for some pew pew
Elite-SWATMEMBER

Enlisted:
2011-12-01
2012-05-22 00:50
KingdomSlayah said:
Agree BUT CONSOLES CANT HANDLE IT FOR THE LAST TIME.... I swear the amount of idiots you see on the internet....
I love battlefield in general The shots heard in the background, returning fire with shouts being yelled, a tank rolling up, hearing jets being shot above me, all make the great experiance. Great Job Dice, you still bring that awe factor.
Geoff52779

Enlisted:
2011-10-25
2012-05-22 01:37
mag on ps3 could handle 256 its xbox that can't handle it
cdomenici

Enlisted:
2011-10-26
2012-05-22 01:39 , edited 2012-05-22 01:40 by cdomenici
old topic but i agree.
100% DISAGREE W' THE PROPAGANDA THAT XBOX CONSOLE CAN'T HANDLE 32 PLAYERS.
THAT'S BULLSHIT.......ALL IT TAKES IS TIME, MONEY, DECENT CODING & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
STOP SPROUTING B/S U HEARD FROM SOMEONE ON HERE OR SOME ILL INFORMED IDIOT.
costno

Enlisted:
2011-10-26
2012-05-22 01:43
Geoff52779 said:
mag on ps3 could handle 256 its xbox that can't handle it
this guy doesn't understand the difference between mag and bf3
signature signature signature signature, oh oh oh its my signature
kkmm119

Enlisted:
2012-02-20
2012-05-22 01:53
wait we said that consoles cannot handle 64 man servers. Does anyone have a link for a 'no' to 32 man server?
RoLLnBLuNtZzzzzz

Enlisted:
2011-10-26
2012-05-22 01:54
Geoff52779 said:
mag on ps3 could handle 256 its xbox that can't handle it
lol ur an idiot HEEEEEHAWWWWW DONKEY BOY
Have you ever seen shit hit the fan?
JalepenoPaul713

Enlisted:
2011-11-02
2012-05-22 01:58
KingdomSlayah said:
Agree BUT CONSOLES CANT HANDLE IT FOR THE LAST TIME.... I swear the amount of idiots you see on the internet....
Actually you can but microsoft and sony have bandwidth limits on LIVE and PSN, so Dice could not get it approved.
Call the hospital and have them send the doctors home, cause i'll be doing the operating around here.
MavevV

Enlisted:
2011-10-26
2012-05-22 01:59 , edited 2012-05-22 02:00 by MavevV
^^^ a while back dice said that they don't do it because of the hardware it's not sony and Microsoft limitations.
XxSiL3nTwInDxX said:
bf3 on console should have 32 man servers agreee or disagree??
disagree the ps3 and 360 don't have the proper hardware to handle it. but if they could handle it ,which they can't, i would agree
jayjayff

Enlisted:
2011-10-29
2012-05-22 02:02
Here is hoping we get 32 man action on ps4.
omgmyidistaken
Enlisted: 2012-02-23
2012-05-22 02:02
ps3 can handle but would freeze up much more often xbow might esplode
eQs- the best players you could ever spend your time with.
RetiredCafe

Enlisted:
2011-10-25
2012-05-22 02:04
wait till i join DICE Developer Team.. i will sure think of this idea
codbinder
Enlisted: 2012-07-25
2012-08-18 23:05
But Homefront and section 8 can run on a 32 man server so why can't any other game?