Titanfall sucks!!!!

INFIDELSLAYER
PS Enlisted: 2012-08-15
2014-02-09 21:34
Why Ea?Ruin a game just to make profit from another garbage game?
omcdnr
TR Enlisted: 2012-08-16
2014-02-09 22:34
i didnt see like that but it is pretty much it lol. Bf have fans already so screwing it will not effect the profits etc. And from a screwed game a lot of people going to buy titanfall.
RustyFrags
US Enlisted: 2011-10-31
2014-02-09 22:34
Mhmmm, a game that hasn't been released yet sucks.

Makes sense.
Winning exemplifies nothing.
TheJelan
HU Enlisted: 2013-08-16
2014-02-09 22:38
I soooooo looked forward to TF, but BF4 came out and decided to go with it, now I won't buy any FPS anytime soon, especially not one published by EA :3 .
The most important thing is that you are wrong.
DaSchweini
CA Enlisted: 2012-01-28
2014-02-09 22:40
Okay.

Why does it suck?
PIG OVERSEER IS IMMORTAL.
meatcutter66
US Enlisted: 2012-10-05
2014-02-10 05:54
The game will be 6 vs 6 with mechs and bots but I won't judge till I see it in action. Anybody know when the beta is up?
Guilliman
BE Enlisted: 2011-10-28
2014-02-10 05:56
titan fall should have bigger maps and 128v128. Just imagine 100+ mechs battling it out over an area several square kilometres.


Too bad next gen consoles are actually piss poor and don't allow such "intensive" games.
– on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
INFIDELSLAYER
PS Enlisted: 2012-08-15
2014-02-10 13:54
Guilliman said:
titan fall should have bigger maps and 128v128. Just imagine 100+ mechs battling it out over an area several square kilometres.


Too bad next gen consoles are actually piss poor and don't allow such "intensive" games.


Lol if this happens im buying:)
KinkyFiction
CA Enlisted: 2013-10-02
2014-02-10 14:00
What is sad is that EA has so many by the short and curlies. They cobble together this abortion of a Battlefield title, half of everyone is all "NEVER AGAIN!", now people are tripping over themselves to throw more cash at the "Big Satan" (AKA EA) for the next polished up turd. It's truly sad and nothing will change so long as they can keep cashing paycheques. Well done.
AmF-Murderin
US Enlisted: 2013-11-04
2014-02-10 14:00
This game is going to flop so hard.
Marinovv
BG Enlisted: 2013-04-10
2014-02-10 14:02
AmF-Murderin said:
This game is going to flop so hard.

I smell it too.
DO YOU LIKE ME NAOW, BIATCH?
Luso91915
SK Enlisted: 2011-11-02
2014-02-10 14:03
RustyFrags said:
Mhmmm, a game that hasn't been released yet sucks.

Makes sense.
Marinovv
BG Enlisted: 2013-04-10
2014-02-10 14:04
Luso91915 said:
RustyFrags said:
Mhmmm, a game that hasn't been released yet sucks.

Makes sense.

Luso91915 said:
RustyFrags said:
Mhmmm, a game that hasn't been released yet sucks.

Makes sense.

Makes sense, alot.
huehuehue
DO YOU LIKE ME NAOW, BIATCH?
Mythhology
GB Enlisted: 2011-11-05
2014-02-10 14:05
Guilliman said:
titan fall should have bigger maps and 128v128. Just imagine 100+ mechs battling it out over an area several square kilometres.


Too bad next gen consoles are actually piss poor and don't allow such "intensive" games.

Planetside 2 is coming to the PS4, that will hold many people in one area.
DatNoobie
Enlisted: 2011-10-24
2014-02-10 14:08
CANT GET INTO BETA NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

OWAIT THERE'S STILL NO CB
Jenkes1988
FI Enlisted: 2011-10-31
2014-02-10 14:30 , edited 2014-02-10 15:34 by Jenkes1988
I guess the reason is that the teams are small. But for your information and everyone elses, they have stated multiple times in various topics that they have successfully tested and the game has worked with bigger teams and at the same time it was stable but it is merely their design choice for now so that is a thing and I completely understand that. Often than not, people forget that if the game is not balanced around big teams well then the game itself will be horrible if the teams are too big for the maps they have or other aspects of the game. This is what creates clusters in maps such as Operation Locker 64 player Conquest because the map itself was not designed for such a big teams against each other. Of course they are pretty popular due to providing the easiest way to unlock everything but that is another debate all together.

If the reason for the original posters statement was something else then whatever but I'm just saying this to everyone who complains about the team sizes in that game. It is just plain stupidity.
UninstalledBF
Enlisted: 2012-12-10
2014-02-10 15:04
More players isn't inherently better. Many World at War (CoD5) servers have 40 and 50 people on relatively small maps, and even though I love action and fast pace, that's just stupid for most of the map sizes. The player count should fit the map design.
Im_Going_Space
GB Enlisted: 2011-10-27
2014-02-10 15:09
I played titanfall at eurogamer, it was 12v12 + AI. and it was brilliant. i'd have rathered it stayed that way, but until i play 6v6 i couldnt say how it balances out.
http://bf4stats.com/xone/Im%20Going%20Space UMD Platoon